When searching for a breach of contract lawyer toronto, your legal path and potential costs depend entirely on the financial value of your dispute. According to the Ontario Courts, claims up to $50,000 are heard in Small Claims Court, while disputes between $50,001 and $200,000 proceed under the Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s Simplified Procedure. Anything exceeding $200,000 triggers standard civil litigation.
Under Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, you have a strict two-year window from discovery to file a lawsuit. If you win, Ontario’s “loser-pays” system generally allows you to recover 40% to 60% of your actual legal costs from the opposing party. Understanding these mechanics before you file a claim is what separates a strategic business decision from a costly legal misstep.
Resolving a Dispute with a Breach of Contract Lawyer Toronto: Realities, Timelines, and Economics
In Toronto, commercial contract enforcement is governed by Ontario common law and the Courts of Justice Act, giving plaintiffs the right to pursue legal remedies when a binding agreement is violated. To succeed with a breach of contract lawyer toronto, plaintiffs must first face the strict statutory timeline for filing a claim and understand how courts interpret the severity of the breach.
Ontario law distinguishes between a material breach (a violation that strikes at the core of the contract, depriving the innocent party of the agreement’s primary benefit) and a minor breach (a failure to fulfill a non-essential term). If a commercial supplier delivers goods three months late, halting your manufacturing line, that is typically a material breach. If they deliver the goods three days late with no impact on your operations, it is likely a minor breach. A material breach, often referred to as a repudiatory breach, generally entitles the innocent party to terminate the contract and sue for damages. A minor breach only allows you to sue for the specific financial loss caused by the minor failure, but you must continue to uphold your end of the contract.
The economics of a breach of contract dictate that you must weigh the value of your damages against the hard costs of litigation. Civil litigation ties up working capital, demands internal corporate resources, and creates operational distraction. Proceeding blindly without calculating your precise damages, your likelihood of collection, and your upfront legal fees often costs more than the breach itself.
The Discoverability Principle and the Two-Year Clock
Under Section 4 of Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, you have a basic limitation period of exactly 2 years to commence a lawsuit. Miss this window, and your claim is legally barred, subject only to an ultimate 15-year limitation period under Section 15 of the Act.
The two-year clock does not necessarily start on the day the contract was signed, nor always on the day the breach occurred. It starts based on the principle of “discoverability.” The clock begins ticking on the day you first knew, or the day a reasonable person in your position ought to have known, that a breach occurred, that you suffered a loss, and that a court proceeding is the appropriate remedy. If a contractor uses substandard wiring inside a commercial wall, you may not discover the breach until an electrical failure occurs three years later. In that scenario, the two-year limitation period begins on the date the failure revealed the defect.
Notably, Ontario courts increasingly enforce “rolling limitation periods” for contracts with continuous or periodic obligations. If your dispute involves recurring commercial lease payments, a monthly software subscription, or a multi-year installment service agreement, a new two-year clock starts with each individual missed payment. You cannot sue for an invoice that became due 25 months ago, but you can still sue for the invoice that became due 23 months ago under the exact same contract.
Calculating Damages and the Strict Duty to Mitigate
Ontario law prioritizes making the injured party whole, not punishing the breaching party. Punitive damages in contract law are exceptionally rare and reserved only for malicious, high-handed corporate misconduct. Instead, your claim will focus on concrete financial remedies.
Expectation Damages: This is the default remedy in Ontario. The court calculates the exact financial position you would occupy today had the contract been properly fulfilled, and awards you the difference. If you contracted to buy raw materials for $100,000, the supplier breached, and you had to buy replacement materials on the spot market for $130,000, your expectation damages are $30,000.
Reliance Damages: If expectation damages are too speculative to prove (for example, in a new business venture with no historical profit data), the court may award reliance damages. This compensates you for the out-of-pocket expenses you reasonably incurred while relying on the contract being fulfilled, returning you to the financial position you held before the contract was signed.
Liquidated Damages vs. Penalty Clauses: Many commercial contracts include a clause stating exactly how much must be paid if a breach occurs. In Ontario, courts will enforce these “liquidated damages” clauses only if they represent a genuine, reasonable pre-estimate of the actual loss. If the court determines the clause was designed merely to terrorize or penalize the other party with an aggressively inflated figure, it will strike the clause down as an unenforceable penalty.
The Duty to Mitigate: You cannot sit back and watch your losses multiply after a breach. Ontario law imposes a strict duty on the innocent party to take reasonable steps to minimize their financial damage. If your commercial tenant breaks their lease and abandons the property, you must actively try to find a new tenant. If a judge determines you made no effort to mitigate your loss, they will subtract the amount you could have saved from your final damages award.
The 3 Toronto Court Thresholds: Small Claims, Rule 76, and Superior Court
The venue for your breach of contract claim in Toronto depends entirely on the monetary value of your dispute. You cannot simply choose your preferred courtroom; you must file in the jurisdiction that matches your claimed damages. The thresholds are claims up to $50,000, claims up to $200,000, and claims exceeding $200,000.
Claims Up to $50,000: Ontario Small Claims Court Rules and Paralegal Representation
If your contract dispute is worth $50,000 or less, you will file in the Ontario Small Claims Court. A recent update under Ontario Regulation 42/25 raised this monetary jurisdiction ceiling from $35,000 to $50,000, allowing far more commercial disputes to utilize this streamlined system.
The Small Claims Court is a branch of the Superior Court of Justice, but it operates under relaxed procedural and evidentiary rules designed for speed and efficiency. Hearsay evidence is often admitted, and cases are heard by Deputy Judges. Before you can proceed to a trial, the rules require both parties to attend a mandatory settlement conference with a judge who will assess the strengths of the case and push for a resolution.
Because the procedures are simplified, you can dramatically lower your litigation costs by utilizing Paralegal Services Toronto instead of hiring a full corporate lawyer. Paralegals in Ontario are fully licensed by the Law Society of Ontario to independently represent clients in Small Claims Court. If your claim is worth $60,000, you are strictly prohibited from “splitting” the claim into two $30,000 lawsuits. However, you can legally abandon the $10,000 excess to fit your claim under the $50,000 ceiling. Often, the savings in legal fees generated by comparing a Small Claims Lawyer vs. Paralegal far outweigh the abandoned excess.
Claims from $50,001 to $200,000: Superior Court Rule 76 Simplified Procedure
For mid-tier disputes, your claim will proceed under the Superior Court of Justice Simplified Procedure, governed by Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 76. This tier handles claims between $50,001 and $200,000. It was explicitly designed to keep litigation costs proportionate to the damages you are seeking, preventing a scenario where it costs $100,000 in legal fees to recover a $90,000 debt.
To prevent cases from dragging on, Rule 76 strictly caps oral examinations for discovery at 3 hours per party. Standard litigation allows for vastly broader discovery, but this procedural limit forces both sides to stay focused on the core breach rather than burying each other in billable hours. Furthermore, Rule 76 allows for summary trials, where evidence in chief is presented via sworn written affidavits rather than lengthy, expensive oral testimony on the witness stand.
Claims Exceeding $200,000: Full Superior Court Litigation and the Toronto Commercial List
Disputes exceeding $200,000 trigger standard civil litigation procedure in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. These high-stakes cases face the full weight of the civil justice system. The discovery process is exhaustive. Both parties must swear an Affidavit of Documents, categorized into Schedule A (relevant documents you have), Schedule B (documents you claim privilege over), and Schedule C (documents you once had but no longer possess). E-discovery in complex corporate matters can involve reviewing thousands of emails, Slack messages, and financial ledgers.
If your dispute involves complex corporate contract breaches, shareholder agreements, or highly technical commercial arrangements, your case may be heard on the Commercial List in Toronto. Located at 330 University Avenue, the Commercial List is a specialized court designated specifically to fast-track complex commercial litigation, presided over by judges with extensive backgrounds in corporate law.
The Demand Letter Strategy: Private Market Costs and Leverage
In almost all Toronto commercial disputes, you should send a formal demand letter before proceeding directly to court—unless you are days away from an expiring statutory deadline.
The decision comes down to raw economics. Drafting and issuing a formal breach of contract demand letter typically costs between $500 and $1,500 when prepared by a private market Ontario lawyer. In contrast, drafting a formal Statement of Claim and navigating the early stages of litigation under the Rules of Civil Procedure immediately triggers thousands of dollars in legal fees and court filing costs. For a fraction of the cost of a lawsuit, a demand letter forces the opposing party to evaluate their legal exposure and often prompts a negotiated settlement before a claim is ever filed.
Anatomy of an Effective Demand Letter
An effective demand letter is not an emotional airing of grievances. It is a precise, tactical document that sets the stage for litigation. A strong letter includes:
- The Factual Matrix: A chronological outline of the relationship, citing the exact date the contract was executed and the specific clauses that were breached.
- The Damage Calculation: A clear, itemized accounting of the expectation or reliance damages suffered, demonstrating that your claim is grounded in hard math, not arbitrary demands.
- The Cure Period: A strict deadline (usually 10 to 14 days) for the opposing party to either pay the damages, cure the defect in their performance, or have their legal counsel contact your lawyer to negotiate.
- The Consequence: A clear statement that failure to resolve the matter by the deadline will result in the immediate filing of a Statement of Claim, and that the demand letter will be presented to the judge during cost submissions to prove you attempted to resolve the matter reasonably.
To ensure your evidence is organized and your overall strategy is sound before sending that letter, read our guide on Breach of Contract: 7 Proven Steps to Protect Your Business Deals.
When to Skip the Letter and File a Claim
There is one glaring exception to the demand letter rule: the clock. Under Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, you face that strict two-year limitation period. If you are approaching the two-year mark since discovering the breach, you do not have time to wait for a 14-day demand response. You must draft and issue a Statement of Claim immediately to preserve your right to sue. Once the claim is issued, the limitation period is protected, and you can attempt to negotiate a settlement afterward.
Toronto-Specific Litigation Rules: Rule 24.1 Mandatory Mediation
If you file a breach of contract lawsuit in Toronto’s Ontario Superior Court of Justice, you cannot proceed straight to a trial judge. Under Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24.1, Toronto is a designated mandatory mediation jurisdiction (alongside Ottawa and Windsor). This means your case is legally required to go through a formal mediation session before you are permitted to schedule a trial.
The province implemented this rule to clear court backlogs and force early settlement discussions before legal fees spiral out of control. It applies whether your contract dispute is proceeding on the standard litigation track for claims over $200,000, or under the Simplified Procedure for claims between $50,001 and $200,000.
Here is how the Rule 24.1 process operates in practice:
- Selection of a mediator: Once pleadings are closed—meaning the Statement of Claim, Statement of Defence, and any Reply are officially filed—both sides have 30 days to agree on a neutral third party from a designated roster of mediators, or select a private mediator of their choosing.
- The mediation brief: Your lawyer will draft a concise statement summarizing the breached contract terms, the timeline of the dispute, the specific damages claimed, and the key documentary evidence. This is exchanged with the opposing party and provided to the mediator at least seven days before the session.
- The session mechanics: Mediation typically begins with a joint session where both lawyers present opening statements. The parties then separate into different rooms (caucusing). The mediator shuttles between the rooms, testing the weaknesses in each side’s case. A roster mediator does not impose a binding decision. Instead, they facilitate a closed-door negotiation, highlight practical litigation risks, and push both parties toward a financial settlement.
Settling at this stage is highly strategic. It bypasses the heaviest legal expenses—such as the strict 3-hour per party examination for discovery phase under Rule 76, or the exhaustive multi-day discoveries in standard litigation—and guarantees a financial outcome rather than risking a judge’s interpretation of your contract. If mediation fails, the mediator issues a certificate of non-settlement, and your litigation proceeds toward the discovery phase. Note that if your claim is under $50,000, you bypass Rule 24.1 entirely and attend a mandatory settlement conference in the Ontario Small Claims Court instead.
How a Breach of Contract Lawyer Toronto Uses Cost-Shifting and Rule 49 Settlement Offers
Ontario civil courts operate on a strict “loser-pays” system, meaning the unsuccessful party is generally ordered to pay a significant portion of the winning party’s legal expenses. However, winning your breach of contract case does not mean your opponent writes a blank check to cover your entire invoice.
Under standard court orders governed by the Courts of Justice Act, a successful litigant is awarded “partial indemnity.” In practice, this means the winner typically recovers 40% to 60% of their actual, reasonable legal fees. You will remain responsible for paying the balance to your legal team. You must factor this out-of-pocket reality into the economics of your litigation strategy from day one. Winning a $100,000 judgment that costs you $70,000 in legal fees, of which you only recover $35,000 in costs, leaves you mathematically disadvantaged despite winning the trial.
To increase that recovery percentage and aggressively pressure the opposing party to resolve the dispute out of court, litigators leverage Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 49. Rule 49 is a strategic cost-shifting weapon designed to penalize parties who unreasonably refuse to settle and drag matters to trial unnecessarily.
The mechanics of a Rule 49 offer operate as follows:
- You serve a formal, written settlement offer to the opposing party at least seven days before the trial begins.
- The opposing party rejects, ignores, or fails to beat your offer with a counter-offer.
- You proceed to trial and win a judgment that is as favorable as, or better than, the terms you originally offered to accept.
If you are the plaintiff and you beat your own Rule 49 offer at trial, the court typically elevates your cost award from partial indemnity to “substantial indemnity” from the date the offer was served. Substantial indemnity covers a dramatically higher percentage of your actual legal fees. The financial threat of absorbing a substantial indemnity cost order—on top of the actual damages awarded—forces opponents to take early settlement offers seriously.
Post-Judgment Enforcement Realities in Ontario
Winning a trial or summary judgment motion and receiving a court order for damages is only the first phase of the battle. A court order is simply a declaration that the defendant owes you money; the court does not automatically collect the funds and transfer them to your account. If the losing party refuses to write a check, your breach of contract lawyer toronto must engage in post-judgment enforcement under the Ontario Execution Act.
The speed and success of collection depend entirely on the defendant’s assets. Common enforcement tools include:
- Garnishment: If you know where the defendant banks, or if you know the identity of a third party who owes the defendant money (such as an employer or an accounts receivable client), the court can issue a Notice of Garnishment to intercept those funds and redirect them to the court on your behalf.
- Writ of Seizure and Sale of Land: You can file a writ with the local sheriff in any jurisdiction where the defendant owns real estate. This acts as a lien. The defendant cannot sell or refinance their property without first paying your judgment out of the proceeds.
- Examination in Aid of Execution: Often called a debtor’s examination, this forces the losing party to sit under oath and answer questions about their income, property, bank accounts, and corporate assets, providing you with the intelligence needed to launch garnishments or seizures.
Assessing a defendant’s ability to pay must happen before you issue the Statement of Claim. Securing a $200,000 judgment against an insolvent corporation with no assets is a hollow victory that generates nothing but legal bills.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does a breach of contract lawyer toronto cost?
The cost of a breach of contract lawyer toronto varies based on the court track and complexity of your case. A formal demand letter typically costs between $500 and $1,500. For litigation, costs scale depending on whether you are in Small Claims Court, using the Simplified Procedure (which caps discovery), or proceeding with standard Superior Court litigation. Because Ontario operates on a “loser-pays” system, a successful plaintiff can generally recover 40% to 60% of their reasonable legal fees from the breaching party.
How long do I have to sue for breach of contract in Toronto?
Under Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, you generally have a strict 2-year basic limitation period from the date you discovered the breach, or ought reasonably to have discovered it, to initiate a lawsuit. However, courts enforce “rolling limitation periods” for contracts with continuous periodic obligations, such as recurring lease payments or ongoing service installments, where each missed payment triggers a new two-year window. Missing this exact statutory window permanently bars you from seeking damages in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, subject only to an ultimate 15-year cap regardless of discoverability.
What is the monetary limit for Small Claims Court versus Superior Court in Ontario?
The monetary ceiling for the Ontario Small Claims Court was recently increased to $50,000 under Ontario Regulation 42/25. If your dispute is between $50,001 and $200,000, it falls under the Superior Court’s Simplified Procedure governed by Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 76, where oral examinations for discovery are strictly capped at 3 hours per party to reduce litigation duration. Claims exceeding $200,000 must proceed through standard civil litigation with full discovery rights in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
Can I recover my legal fees if I win a breach of contract lawsuit in Ontario?
Yes, Ontario courts follow a “loser-pays” cost-shifting regime where the prevailing party generally recovers partial indemnity costs. This typically covers 40% to 60% of your actual, reasonable legal fees incurred during the dispute. You remain responsible for the balance. However, you can significantly increase this recovery to substantial indemnity costs if you serve and subsequently beat a formal settlement offer made under Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 49.
Is a formal demand letter required before suing for breach of contract?
While not legally mandatory to file a Statement of Claim, sending a formal demand letter is a standard strategic first step to resolve disputes without entering the court system. Drafting and issuing a formal demand letter typically costs between $500 and $1,500 when prepared by a private practice Ontario lawyer. A well-drafted letter clearly outlines the expectation damages, sets a strict cure deadline, and positions you favorably for cost submissions if the matter eventually proceeds before a judge.
What is mandatory mediation under Rule 24.1 in Toronto civil proceedings?
Toronto is one of the designated jurisdictions where civil actions in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice must undergo mandatory mediation under Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24.1. This rule requires both parties to sit with a neutral mediator early in the litigation process, typically after pleadings are closed. The mediator facilitates closed-door negotiations to force a settlement attempt before court resources are consumed, standard discovery costs escalate, and trial dates are scheduled.
Can text messages, WhatsApp, and emails be used as evidence of a contract breach?
Yes, Ontario courts routinely admit digital communications like emails, WhatsApp threads, and text messages as binding evidence under the rules of documentary discovery. As long as the digital evidence is authenticated and relevant to the factual matrix of the dispute, judges treat these exchanges as valid proof of contract terms, handshake modifications, admissions of liability, or repudiatory breaches just as they would a traditional signed paper document.
Take Strategic Action on Your Toronto Contract Dispute
Your immediate first step in any contract dispute is confirming your claim falls within the strict 2-year limitation period set by the Limitations Act, 2002. Missing this window extinguishes your right to sue, regardless of how strong your underlying evidence is. Because the clock starts ticking the moment you discover the breach or damages, waiting passively to see if the opposing party voluntarily corrects their mistake is a costly strategic error.
To position your case for maximum recovery under Ontario’s loser-pays cost-shifting regime, compile these specific assets before engaging opposing counsel:
- The controlling agreement: Gather the fully executed contract, including all schedules, addendums, and any written correspondence or digital evidence (emails, WhatsApp threads) modifying the terms.
- Proof of damages: Assemble concrete financial records showing exactly what you lost in expectation or reliance damages. This specific dollar amount dictates your litigation track, whether that is the Small Claims Court for claims up to $50,000, or the Ontario Superior Court of Justice for higher-value claims.
- Evidence of mitigation: Document the reasonable, proactive steps you took to minimize your financial losses after the breach occurred. Failing to mitigate gives the judge grounds to drastically reduce your final damages award.
- Asset intelligence: Gather any information you have regarding the breaching party’s banking details, real estate holdings, or accounts receivable to ensure a judgment can actually be enforced.
Once your file is organized, you need a precise economic assessment of your claim’s viability. A formal demand letter can frequently force a settlement before a statement of claim is ever filed, avoiding the heavy machinery of the civil justice system. If litigation becomes necessary, you need a strategy designed to navigate mandatory mediation and utilize Rule 49 settlement offers to secure substantial indemnity costs.
Ignoring a broken agreement drains your resources and puts your business at operational risk. If you need clarity on your legal options and the most cost-effective path forward, get in touch with a breach of contract lawyer toronto business owners trust. We will evaluate your claim, determine the right court jurisdiction, calculate your true financial exposure, and build a decisive strategy to aggressively enforce your legal rights.
{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”BlogPosting”,”headline”:”Breach of Contract Lawyer Toronto: Proven Paths & Costs”,”description”:”Searching for a breach of contract lawyer toronto? Discover the true costs, 3 essential legal paths, and strict timelines to protect your business.”,”author”:{“@type”:”Organization”,”name”:”Ylaw”},”publisher”:{“@type”:”Organization”,”name”:”Ylaw”},”datePublished”:”2026-08-29T01:18:30.870Z”,”dateModified”:”2026-08-29T01:18:30.870Z”}
{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”FAQPage”,”mainEntity”:[{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”How much does a breach of contract lawyer toronto cost?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”The cost of a breach of contract lawyer toronto varies based on the court track and complexity of your case. A formal demand letter typically costs between $500 and $1,500. For litigation, costs scale depending on whether you are in Small Claims Court, using the Simplified Procedure (which caps discovery), or proceeding with standard Superior Court litigation. Because Ontario operates on a \”loser-pays\” system, a successful plaintiff can generally recover 40% to 60% of their reasonable legal fees from the breaching party.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”How long do I have to sue for breach of contract in Toronto?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Under Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, you generally have a strict 2-year basic limitation period from the date you discovered the breach, or ought reasonably to have discovered it, to initiate a lawsuit. However, courts enforce \”rolling limitation periods\” for contracts with continuous periodic obligations, such as recurring lease payments or ongoing service installments, where each missed payment triggers a new two-year window. Missing this exact statutory window permanently bars you from seeking damages in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, subject only to an ultimate 15-year cap regardless of discoverability.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”What is the monetary limit for Small Claims Court versus Superior Court in Ontario?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”The monetary ceiling for the Ontario Small Claims Court was recently increased to $50,000 under Ontario Regulation 42/25. If your dispute is between $50,001 and $200,000, it falls under the Superior Court’s Simplified Procedure governed by Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 76, where oral examinations for discovery are strictly capped at 3 hours per party to reduce litigation duration. Claims exceeding $200,000 must proceed through standard civil litigation with full discovery rights in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Can I recover my legal fees if I win a breach of contract lawsuit in Ontario?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Yes, Ontario courts follow a \”loser-pays\” cost-shifting regime where the prevailing party generally recovers partial indemnity costs. This typically covers 40% to 60% of your actual, reasonable legal fees incurred during the dispute. You remain responsible for the balance. However, you can significantly increase this recovery to substantial indemnity costs if you serve and subsequently beat a formal settlement offer made under Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 49.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Is a formal demand letter required before suing for breach of contract?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”While not legally mandatory to file a Statement of Claim, sending a formal demand letter is a standard strategic first step to resolve disputes without entering the court system. Drafting and issuing a formal demand letter typically costs between $500 and $1,500 when prepared by a private practice Ontario lawyer. A well-drafted letter clearly outlines the expectation damages, sets a strict cure deadline, and positions you favorably for cost submissions if the matter eventually proceeds before a judge.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”What is mandatory mediation under Rule 24.1 in Toronto civil proceedings?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Toronto is one of the designated jurisdictions where civil actions in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice must undergo mandatory mediation under Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 24.1. This rule requires both parties to sit with a neutral mediator early in the litigation process, typically after pleadings are closed. The mediator facilitates closed-door negotiations to force a settlement attempt before court resources are consumed, standard discovery costs escalate, and trial dates are scheduled.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Can text messages, WhatsApp, and emails be used as evidence of a contract breach?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Yes, Ontario courts routinely admit digital communications like emails, WhatsApp threads, and text messages as binding evidence under the rules of documentary discovery. As long as the digital evidence is authenticated and relevant to the factual matrix of the dispute, judges treat these exchanges as valid proof of contract terms, handshake modifications, admissions of liability, or repudiatory breaches just as they would a traditional signed paper document.”}}]}
